In several complaints upheld by the Financial Ombudsman Service, HSBC has been found not to have sufficiently upheld its responsibilities to its customers, resulting in them losing significant amounts of money.
Company C
Company C, a business customer of HSBC, lost over €30,000 as the result of an intercept scam in which fraudsters used a spoof email address to intercept the communications – namely invoices – between the business and a genuine overseas seller. The fraudster then amended the bank details for the invoice thus diverting the payment to their own account.
HSBC refused to refund Company C as it had approved the transaction to the scammer – despite the fact Company C still believed at the time that the details were for the genuine seller. The complaint was taken to the FOS for an independent review.
The FOS upheld Company C’s complaint against HSBC, determining that the bank had not taken sufficient steps expected of banks to detect and prevent the fraud, and ordering the bank to refund the company in full, plus 8% interest.
Mr and Mrs W
HSBC customers, Mr and Mrs W lost over £9,000 of their savings to a sophisticated investment scam promising ‘high returns’. After finding the ‘investment opportunity’ online the couple visited their local HSBC branch and requested the relevant funds to be transferred from their savings account.
When the promised investment returns did not arrive, Mr and Mrs W realised they had been scammed and reported it to HSBC. The bank refused to refund them the money, again placing the blame on the couple for authorising the transactions.
An independent FOS investigator found in favour of Mr and Mrs W concluding that it was not satisfied that HSBC made sufficient checks to ensure that Mr and Mrs W would be safe from fraud or scams. Given that the scam was so sophisticated, FOS determined that the couple should not bear any responsibility for their losses. HSBC was ordered to repay the full amount lost, plus interest at 8%.