If criminal proceedings are taken following a police investigation into the fraud, and there is a successful conviction, then the Court can award compensation. However, it can be difficult to trace the fraudster, mainly if they are overseas, or they may no longer have any assets to pay any compensation awarded by the criminal courts.
Impersonation scams are just one type of Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud. This is where you authorise the transfer of money from your bank to an individual or company, believing them to be genuine. Banks have generally been unwilling to refund money lost because of APP fraud – as the scam victim authorises the payments, they have traditionally been held responsible for their own losses.
If you have been the victim of a scam and feel that the bank did not do enough to protect your money, then you can make a complaint. If you are not happy with the bank’s response, then the complaint can be escalated to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), a Government-backed body aimed at resolving disputes between financial businesses and their customers. FOS has the power to award compensation if it feels that following its investigations the bank should have been more proactive in protecting its customers from the risk of financial harm.
There have been a number of important recent decisions in APP fraud cases made in favour of the scam victim rather than the bank. Codes of conduct around due diligence exist to protect banking customers.
Banks have a duty to:
- Monitor accounts and transactions for risks like fraud, scams and money laundering.
- Have systems in place to identify, delay or block unusual transactions that might suggest fraud.